I see why you want to avoid large numbers of groups - it becomes confusing & unmanageableI think the other side of the argument is stronger, though (within sensible limits). For example, if someone is looking for (say) CICS discussions, they have to wade through all the other transaction manager detailSo, for Transaction Managers, I’d suggest:
• CICS
• IMS
• Other transaction managersFor languages:
... moreI see why you want to avoid large numbers of groups - it becomes confusing & unmanageable
I think the other side of the argument is stronger, though (within sensible limits). For example, if someone is looking for (say) CICS discussions, they have to wade through all the other transaction manager detail
So, for Transaction Managers, I’d suggest:
• CICS
• IMS
• Other transaction managers
For languages:
• Assembler
• COBOL
• PL/1
• REXX
• Other languages
etc
Finbar Burke
Thanks John, it's the direction we are going in (I hope)
