I'm putting this in DevOps for archiving, but it's for the main board also... many of you have comp sci backgrounds, though I have taken a lot of comp sci courses (my degrees are in CIS) I don't know the answer to this question: how do interpreted languages like Python and PERL handle the step after compilation where the object code needs to be linked with and libraries and subprograms needed? It would seem that this would make interpreted vs compiled languages unfeasibly slow... too slow for ... moreI'm putting this in DevOps for archiving, but it's for the main board also... many of you have comp sci backgrounds, though I have taken a lot of comp sci courses (my degrees are in CIS) I don't know the answer to this question: how do interpreted languages like Python and PERL handle the step after compilation where the object code needs to be linked with and libraries and subprograms needed? It would seem that this would make interpreted vs compiled languages unfeasibly slow... too slow for something like Firefox to be written in Python. I know interpreters have gotten a lot faster, but fast enough to ostensibly skip the link-edit step?
Wayne Beavers
The platform of choice for running JAVA, me thinks, is a large Z processor. Same for REXX. I have no internal knowledge of Python or other language that did not start on the mainframe.
